Posted in Rehearsal

Technical Meeting

In doing a Multimedia Module we really wanted to push the technical aspect of our performance. We met with Darren Page and the technical team to discuss our ideas and to see whether or not it was possible to materialise them. The first idea we proposed was the idea of suspending a fabric cube within the LPAC Auditorium. After some debate of how we were going to do this, the conclusion was reached that scaffold poles would extend from the balcony enabling us to drape the fabric over the poles until they reached the floor. This was possible for three of the walls – but we were unsure of how we were going to make the fourth wall. The problem was that the scaffold poles would be suspended by a rope, tied to the grid. Therefore the fourth pole would not be able to attach onto anything. We came to a compromise and decided that the fourth wall would be made through the use of a cinematic screen on the stage. Below a template can be seen of how the space will look:

What it will look like

As you can see this still creates an enclosed space with an opening on one side. Doing this helped in terms of projectors as it meant we could use the bigger projector which the LPAC. The benefit of using this projector is that it was connected to the technical desk, meaning footage played on the projector could be put into Cue Lab and manually controlled.

The next technical issue we approached was the use of projectors. We went into the meeting wanting to use 5 projectors, one for each of the sides of the cube and the  roof. The idea in doing this was to have different sleep related media surrounding the audience members, creating a visually engaging space. However the technicians raised the view that to do this each screen and therefore each projector would need a laptop behind each one, with someone controlling the laptop. Due to the nature of our performance this would not be able to be us controlling it as we were in the controlled world. The assessment falls in performance week, meaning that there would not be enough technicians available. The point was raised that the use of so many projectors would also run the risk of something going wrong.

We contested this greatly as we really wanted to have four different screens, enabling graphics to change the location of the space and provide multiple visuals at once. However we took their advice as we did not want malfunctions with videos, completely impeding our performance. Therefore we decided to narrow it down to just two projectors, one for the cinema screen and one for the grid. We could still use all the sleep media footage we had acquired and run less of a risk of something going wrong. The technicians also suggested the use of light on the remaining walls of the cube to create the same ambiance and atmosphere.

 

Posted in Rehearsal

Work In Progress

19th April 2012

Following the development of our idea we had to quickly adapt what we had done so far for the work in progress session scheduled for the 19th of April.

We did not want the work we had done so far to be irrelevant or go to waste, so we incorporated the previous sleep idea with the new immersive performance, based on a specific event, in this case 9/11 and the catastrophe it caused.

We sectioned off a corner of the room, to emulate the cube we are hoping to create for the final performance. We filled this space with pillows and bean bags making it a comfortable space to be in. We were unable to get hold of projectors or tech for the work in progress, so we created our intentions by placing laptops, one at each of the walls to represent that is where the projections would be. These laptops played loops of our footage that we had attained so far. We used this to act as our sleep related media, giving the audience the awareness of sleep. One by one we began to move from a sitting position to lying down. We then played various mixes of sleep and relaxation music, of which Danny produced and mixed live. The playing of this music occurred for about 10 minutes as this is roughly the amount of time it takes to fall to sleep. Throughout this, each of us would sporadically do a movement out of our grid routine.

Once everyone was in a sleep / half conscious state a mobile phone in the middle of the room began to ring. The phone rang several times before connecting to a voice-mail which played real footage of a phone call that occurred during the events of 9/11. The phone signified the breaking of dreaming, into reality. This is where the immersive performance would take over, producing a virtual reality within the cube of the catastrophes that happened during 9/11. The emphasis would be on the use of the mobile phone and the role it played within this particular emergency.

Feedback:
Once performing this and explaining our idea to the class, the general consensus was that we had the basis of a good idea. The only worry was re-producing or attempting to represent such a big and famous event in history, specifically American history. It would have to be handled very carefully, with especial weariness of not causing offence. The idea was proposed that perhaps the emphasis would be shifted more towards the use of mobile phones, not just in 9/11 but in modern society and events of terror. This way we could add more of a contemporary relevance to our piece.

By Nina Woods

 

Posted in Experimentation, Rehearsal

The Grid

Following the decision to make our Multimedia Performance a piece of immersive theatre, the idea arose of using the technical grid above the auditorium. People would be lying on this grid acting as a birds-eye view of watching people lying in bed asleep. It would; however be the reverse as the audience will be lying on the ground looking up at the grid, acting as a mirror image.

Queries began to arise about health and safety and risk assessments about whether or not it would be possible to have part of our performance on the grid. However after consulting with the technicians of the LPAC they gave us the go ahead with the warning that strict guidelines would follow about what we could specifically do up there. These included health and safety guidelines such as what we can and cannot wear as clothing and that a maximum of three people per square. We felt this was manageable and we could coincide with these regulations as we only intended on having a maximum of three people on the grid, in separate squares.

With the guarantee of using the grid we proceeded to experiment and test how figures and images would look on the grid itself, examples can be seen below:

Grid 3 grid 5

grid 4Grid 2Grid 1

 

Videos:

This first video shows it from an audience perspective as they will be lying on the floor looking in front of them and then their attention will be shifted to above them, laying, looking up at the grid


Experimentation on the grid using a cloth:

Shadows:

Projection:

 

These experimentation’s were very beneficial to us as it brought about the idea of incorporating shadows into this aspect of our performance. Previously we only considered using projections up onto the figures on the grid. However, by pure chance when watching the other members of the group it appealed to us that a mixture of projection and shadows could both be used. Perhaps the projection suggesting dreams and shadows suggesting nightmares due to the lack of identity they provide.

We continued with this idea when we began to choreograph a routine for when members of the group are on the grid.

13865_10200965622204785_937208717_n537055_10200965659765724_823086445_n

Video of beginning of routine:

Choreographing routine:

The routine:

 

By Nina Woods